There's a very big difference between Iraq and Germany for example .. invading is different than being in a country to work it out and at the same time prepare to not think again of being powerful militarily ..
and if they worked out , that means three out of more than 20 countries that were invaded in 1 century by the US ..
Hi Sumerian Girl, I was thinking of occupied countries not invaded :) - but okay - most of those twenty countries you mention must have been during WW I & II - those nations are definitely better off than they were under previous regimes like the Nazis. Others like Cuba and Vietnam would have prospered more under a democracy than their present communist governments.
4 comments:
Well, it worked well in Japan, Germany, and South Korea. Three
out of four ain't bad. But it
is a funny bumper sticker.
There's a very big difference between Iraq and Germany for example .. invading is different than being in a country to work it out and at the same time prepare to not think again of being powerful militarily ..
and if they worked out , that means three out of more than 20 countries that were invaded in 1 century by the US ..
Hi Sumerian Girl,
I was thinking of occupied countries not invaded :) - but okay - most of those twenty countries you mention must have been during WW I & II - those nations are definitely better off than they were under previous regimes like the Nazis. Others like Cuba and Vietnam would have prospered more under a democracy than their present communist governments.
BAD COMPARISON .. it's like saying who's better than Hitler ? BUSH .. UH!!
Post a Comment